<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Verbera Resources</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.verbera.co.uk/resources/index.php/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.verbera.co.uk/resources</link>
	<description>Performance management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 15:46:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Balanced Scorecard Basics</title>
		<link>http://www.verbera.co.uk/resources/index.php/balanced-scorecard-basics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.verbera.co.uk/resources/index.php/balanced-scorecard-basics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Verbera</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Information]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.verbera.co.uk/resources/?p=263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The balanced scorecard is a strategic planning and management system that is used extensively in business and industry, government, and nonprofit organizations worldwide to align business activities to the vision and strategy of the organization, improve internal and external communications, and monitor organization performance against strategic goals. It was originated by Drs. Robert Kaplan (Harvard [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;">The balanced scorecard is a strategic  planning and management system that is used extensively in business and  industry, government, and nonprofit organizations worldwide to align  business activities to the vision and strategy of the organization,  improve internal and external communications, and monitor organization  performance against strategic goals. It was originated by Drs. Robert  Kaplan (Harvard Business School) and David Norton as a performance  measurement framework that added strategic non-financial performance  measures to traditional financial metrics to give managers and  executives a more &#8216;balanced&#8217; view of organizational performance.  While  the phrase balanced scorecard was coined in the early 1990s, the roots  of the this type of approach are deep, and include the pioneering work  of General Electric on performance measurement reporting in the 1950’s  and the work of French process engineers (who created the <em>Tableau de  Bord</em> – literally, a &#8220;dashboard&#8221; of performance measures) in the  early part of the 20th century.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;">The balanced scorecard has  evolved from its early use as a simple performance measurement framework  to a full strategic planning and management system. The “new” balanced  scorecard transforms an organization’s strategic plan from an attractive  but passive document into the &#8220;marching orders&#8221; for the organization on  a daily basis. It provides a framework that not only provides  performance measurements, but helps planners identify what should be  done and measured. It enables executives to truly execute their  strategies.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;">This new approach to  strategic management was first detailed in a series of articles and  books by Drs. Kaplan and Norton. Recognizing some of the weaknesses and  vagueness of previous management approaches, the balanced scorecard  approach provides a clear prescription as to what companies should  measure in order to &#8216;balance&#8217; the financial perspective. The balanced  scorecard is a management system (not only a measurement system) that  enables organizations to clarify their vision and strategy and translate  them into action. It provides feedback around both the internal  business processes and external outcomes in order to continuously  improve strategic performance and results. When fully deployed, the  balanced scorecard transforms strategic planning from an academic  exercise into the nerve center of an enterprise.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;">Kaplan and Norton describe  the innovation of the balanced scorecard as follows:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;">&#8220;The balanced scorecard  retains traditional financial measures. But financial measures tell the  story of past events, an adequate story for industrial age companies for  which investments in long-term capabilities and customer relationships  were not critical for success. These financial measures are inadequate,  however, for guiding and evaluating the journey that information age  companies must make to create future value through investment in  customers, suppliers, employees, processes, technology, and  innovation.&#8221;</p>
<p><img src="http://www.balancedscorecard.org/Portals/0/images/balancedscorecard.jpg" alt="balanced scorecard" width="390" height="309" /></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: xx-small;">Adapted from <em>The  Balanced Scorecard</em> by Kaplan &amp; Norton</span></p>
<h1><span style="font-family: Verdana; color: #006600; font-size: small;"><strong>Perspectives</strong></span></h1>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;">The balanced scorecard  suggests that we view the organization from four perspectives, and to  develop metrics, collect data and analyze it relative to each of these  perspectives:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;"><strong><span style="color: #006600;">The Learning &amp; Growth Perspective<br />
</span></strong>This perspective includes employee training  and corporate cultural attitudes related to both individual and  corporate self-improvement. In a knowledge-worker organization, people  &#8212; the only repository of knowledge &#8212; are the main resource. In the  current climate of rapid technological change, it is becoming necessary  for knowledge workers to be in a continuous learning mode. Metrics can  be put into place to guide managers in focusing training funds where  they can help the most. In any case, learning and growth constitute the  essential foundation for success of any knowledge-worker organization.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;">Kaplan and Norton emphasize  that &#8216;learning&#8217; is more than &#8216;training&#8217;; it also includes things like  mentors and tutors within the organization, as well as that ease of  communication among workers that allows them to readily get help on a  problem when it is needed. It also includes technological tools; what  the Baldrige criteria call &#8220;high performance work systems.&#8221;</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;"><span style="color: #006600;"><strong>The  Business Process Perspective</strong></span><br />
This perspective refers to internal business processes.  Metrics based on this perspective allow the managers to know how well  their business is running, and whether its products and services conform  to customer requirements (the mission). These metrics have to be  carefully designed by those who know these processes most intimately;  with our unique missions these are not something that can be developed  by outside consultants.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;"><span style="color: #006600;"><strong>The  Customer Perspective</strong><br />
</span>Recent management philosophy has shown an increasing  realization of the importance of customer focus and customer  satisfaction in any business. These are leading indicators: if customers  are not satisfied, they will eventually find other suppliers that will  meet their needs. Poor performance from this perspective is thus a  leading indicator of future decline, even though the current financial  picture may look good.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;">In developing metrics for  satisfaction, customers should be analyzed in terms of kinds of  customers and the kinds of processes for which we are providing a  product or service to those customer groups.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="color: #006600;"><strong>The  Financial Perspective</strong></span><br />
Kaplan and Norton do not disregard the traditional need for  financial data. Timely and accurate funding data will always be a  priority, and managers will do whatever necessary to provide it. In  fact, often there is more than enough handling and processing of  financial data. With the implementation of a corporate database, it is  hoped that more of the processing can be centralized and automated. But  the point is that the current emphasis on financials leads to the  &#8220;unbalanced&#8221; situation with regard to other perspectives. </span><span style="font-size: x-small;">There is perhaps a need to include additional financial-related  data, such as risk assessment and cost-benefit data, in this category.</span></span></p>
<h1><span style="font-family: Verdana; color: #006600; font-size: small;"><strong>Strategy  Mapping</strong></span></h1>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Strategy maps are  communication tools used to tell a story of how value is created for the  organization.  They show a logical, step-by-step connection between  strategic objectives (shown as ovals on the map) in the form of a  cause-and-effect chain.  Generally speaking, improving performance in  the objectives found in the Learning &amp; Growth perspective (the  bottom row) enables the organization to improve its Internal Process  perspective Objectives (the next row up), which in turn enables the  organization to create desirable results in the Customer and Financial  perspectives (the top two rows). </span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.verbera.co.uk/resources/index.php/balanced-scorecard-basics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Balanced Scorecards Benefits</title>
		<link>http://www.verbera.co.uk/resources/index.php/balanced-scorecards-benefits/</link>
		<comments>http://www.verbera.co.uk/resources/index.php/balanced-scorecards-benefits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Verbera</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.verbera.co.uk/resources/?p=259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BENEFITS TO YOUR BUSINESS AT A GLANCE › Increased company-wide understanding of corporate vision and strategy › Stronger communication through the cascading and measurement tracking processes › Focus on improved organizational alignment, employee performance and actions according to strategy › Less information overload as focus shifts to only the most important measures › Identification and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="100%" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">BENEFITS  TO YOUR BUSINESS AT A GLANCE</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3">
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="95%" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="13" align="center"></td>
<td height="5" align="left"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="5%" valign="top">›</td>
<td height="20" align="left" valign="top">Increased company-wide  understanding of corporate vision and strategy</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="5%" valign="top">›</td>
<td height="20" align="left" valign="top">Stronger communication through the  cascading and measurement tracking processes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="5%" valign="top">›</td>
<td height="20" align="left" valign="top">Focus on improved organizational  alignment, employee performance and actions according to strategy</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="5%" valign="top">›</td>
<td height="20" align="left" valign="top">Less information overload as focus  shifts to only the most important measures</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="5%" valign="top">›</td>
<td height="20" align="left" valign="top">Identification and overcoming of  issues linked to long-term targets and strategic objectives</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="5%" valign="top">›</td>
<td height="20" align="left" valign="top">Tracking of competencies needed  and available across the enterprise</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="5%" valign="top">›</td>
<td height="20" align="left" valign="top">Support continuous change  management and strategic planning</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="5%" valign="top">›</td>
<td height="20" align="left" valign="top">Alerts to negative performance and  leverage opportunities for growth</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.verbera.co.uk/resources/index.php/balanced-scorecards-benefits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Environmental Key Performance Inidicators (KPIs)</title>
		<link>http://www.verbera.co.uk/resources/index.php/sample-key-performance-indicators-kpis-human-resource-kpi-examples-employee-development-kpi-examples-finance-and-business-kpi-examples-health-and-safety-kpi-examples-environ/</link>
		<comments>http://www.verbera.co.uk/resources/index.php/sample-key-performance-indicators-kpis-human-resource-kpi-examples-employee-development-kpi-examples-finance-and-business-kpi-examples-health-and-safety-kpi-examples-environ/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Verbera</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[KPI Examples]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.verbera.co.uk/resources/?p=257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amount of energy saved due to conservation and efficiency improvements. Average electrical consumption per employee or product sold CO2 Tonnes per employee per month Energy costs per unit of production Energy saved due to conservation &#38; efficiency improvements Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions per employee per month Number of paper pages used per employee per month [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>Amount of  energy saved due to conservation and efficiency improvements.</li>
<li>Average electrical consumption per  employee or product sold</li>
<li>CO2 Tonnes per employee per month</li>
<li>Energy costs per unit of production</li>
<li>Energy saved due to conservation &amp;  efficiency improvements</li>
<li>Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions per  employee per month</li>
<li>Number of paper pages used per employee  per month</li>
<li>Percentage of hazardous operational waste</li>
<li>Percentage of materials used that are  recycled input materials.</li>
<li>Percentage of non-hazardous operational  waste</li>
<li>Percentage of recycled hazardous  operational waste.</li>
<li>Percentage of recycled non-hazardous  operational waste</li>
<li>Total energy used per unit of production</li>
<li>Total on-site created energy</li>
<li>Total Purchased Energy per month</li>
<li>Waste disposed of per amount of product  manufactured</li>
<li>Water use per employee per month</li>
<li>Water used per amount of product  manufacture</li>
</ul>
<p><em>Sample KPIs courtesy of <a href="http://www.hrvinet.com/">hrvinet.com</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.verbera.co.uk/resources/index.php/sample-key-performance-indicators-kpis-human-resource-kpi-examples-employee-development-kpi-examples-finance-and-business-kpi-examples-health-and-safety-kpi-examples-environ/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Health and Safety &#8211; Sample Key Performance Indicators</title>
		<link>http://www.verbera.co.uk/resources/index.php/health-and-safety-sample-key-performance-indicators/</link>
		<comments>http://www.verbera.co.uk/resources/index.php/health-and-safety-sample-key-performance-indicators/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Verbera</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[KPI Examples]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.verbera.co.uk/resources/?p=255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Corrective actions impacting health and Safety may be derived from various health and safety sources. This information can provide the organisation with &#8230; Cost of solved safety non-conformances for the month Employee perception of management commitment Health and safety prevention costs within the month Lost time (in hours) due to accidents (including fatalities) per e.g. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corrective actions impacting health and Safety may be derived from  various health and safety sources.<br />
This information can provide the  organisation with &#8230;</p>
<ul>
<li>Cost of solved safety non-conformances for the month</li>
<li>Employee perception of management  commitment</li>
<li>Health and safety prevention costs within  the month</li>
<li>Lost time (in hours) due to accidents  (including fatalities) per e.g. 100,000 hours worked</li>
<li>Lost time (in hours) due to non-fatal  accidents per e.g. 100,000 hours worked</li>
<li>Number of fatalities per e.g. 100,000  hours worked</li>
<li>Number of non-conformance with legal or  internal standards in safety inspections</li>
<li>Number of reportable accidents per e.g.  100,000 hours worked (including fatalities)</li>
<li>Number of reportable non-fatal accidents  per e.g. 100,000 hours worked</li>
<li>Number of safety inspections for the month</li>
<li>Number of solved safety non-conformances  for the  month</li>
<li>Percentage of attendance at occupational  health and safety (OHS) committee meetings</li>
<li>Percentage of corrective actions closed  out within specified time-frame</li>
<li>Percentage of fatal accidents relative to  all accidents (non-fatal and fatal) per e.g. 100,000 hours worked</li>
<li>Percentage of health and safety  representatives (HSR) positions filled.</li>
<li>Percentage of issues raised by H&amp;S  Reps actioned</li>
<li>Percentage of occupational health and  safety (OHS) committee recommendations implemented</li>
<li>Percentage of products/services assessed  for health &amp; safety impacts</li>
<li>Percentage of significant products and  services categories subject to procedures in which health and safety  impacts of products and services are assessed for improvement</li>
<li>Percentage of staff with adequate  occupational health and safety (OHS) training</li>
<li>Total of hours in safety and health  training in the mont</li>
</ul>
<p><em>Sample KPIs courtesy of <a href="http://www.hrvinet.com/">hrvinet.com</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.verbera.co.uk/resources/index.php/health-and-safety-sample-key-performance-indicators/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Finance and business Key Performance Indicators</title>
		<link>http://www.verbera.co.uk/resources/index.php/finance-and-business-key-performance-indicators/</link>
		<comments>http://www.verbera.co.uk/resources/index.php/finance-and-business-key-performance-indicators/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Verbera</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[KPI Examples]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.verbera.co.uk/resources/?p=253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The list below contains factors which while important may or may not become key performance measures &#8211; it will all depend on the objectives of the organisation at a given point in time. Accounting costs Accounts Payable Accounts Payable Turnover Accounts Receivable Collection Period Accounts Receivable Turnover Average value of overdue invoices Cash Flow Return [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The list below contains factors which while important may or may not  become key performance measures &#8211; it will all depend on the objectives  of the organisation at a given point in time.</p>
<ul>
<li>Accounting costs</li>
<li>Accounts Payable</li>
<li>Accounts Payable Turnover</li>
<li>Accounts Receivable Collection Period</li>
<li>Accounts Receivable Turnover</li>
<li>Average value of overdue invoices</li>
<li>Cash Flow Return on Investments (CFROI)</li>
<li>Common Stock Equity</li>
<li>Corporate credit rating</li>
<li>Cost Income Ratio</li>
<li>Cost per payslip issued</li>
<li>Creditor days</li>
<li>Creditor days</li>
<li>Cumulative Annual Growth Rate (CAGR)</li>
<li>Cycle time for expense reimbursements</li>
<li>Cycle time to perform periodic close</li>
<li>Cycle time to process payroll</li>
<li>Cycle time to resolve an invoice error</li>
<li>Cycle time to resolve payroll errors</li>
<li>Days Payable</li>
<li>Debtor days</li>
<li>Direct costs</li>
<li>EBIT</li>
<li>EBITDA</li>
<li>Enterprise Value / Takeover Value</li>
<li>Equity ratio</li>
<li>Expenses claims processed per FTE</li>
<li>Fixed costs</li>
<li>Gearing</li>
<li>Indirect costs</li>
<li>Invoicing processing costs</li>
<li>Long-Term Debt</li>
<li>Marginal costs</li>
<li>Net Change in Cash</li>
<li>Number of invoices outstanding</li>
<li>Number of overdue invoices</li>
<li>Other Current Liabilities</li>
<li>Other Non-current Liabilities</li>
<li>Payment errors as Percentage of total  payroll disbursement</li>
<li>Percentage of bad debts against invoiced  revenue</li>
<li>Percentage of electronic invoices</li>
<li>Percentage of expense report exception  line items</li>
<li>Percentage of financial reports issued on  time</li>
<li>Percentage of invoices disputed</li>
<li>Percentage of invoices requiring special  payment</li>
<li>Percentage of invoices under query</li>
<li>Percentage of low value invoices</li>
<li>Percentage of manual payroll payments</li>
<li>Percentage of payable invoices that have  not been matched to a purchase order</li>
<li>Preferred Stock Equity</li>
<li>Profit per customer</li>
<li>Profit per employee (FTE)</li>
<li>Profit per product</li>
<li>Profit per project</li>
<li>Receivables against Product,</li>
<li>Region, Sales office</li>
<li>Return on capital employed (ROCE)</li>
<li>Return on Equity (ROE)</li>
<li>Short-Term Debt</li>
<li>Cost of payroll process as Percentage of  total payroll cost</li>
<li>Total Assets</li>
<li>Total Current Liabilities</li>
<li>Total Equity</li>
<li>Total Liabilities</li>
<li>Total sum of monetary value of outstanding  invoices</li>
<li>Total value of overdue invoices</li>
<li>Variable costs</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.verbera.co.uk/resources/index.php/finance-and-business-key-performance-indicators/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Five Basic Performance Measures</title>
		<link>http://www.verbera.co.uk/resources/index.php/five-basic-performance-measures/</link>
		<comments>http://www.verbera.co.uk/resources/index.php/five-basic-performance-measures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Verbera</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.verbera.co.uk/resources/?p=250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;re starting out with measurement but don&#8217;t have a clearly articulated strategy &#8211; or any strategy at all &#8211; you&#8217;re probably feeling stuck about what to measure to manage performance. With no goals, no objectives, and no clear priorities, everything seems important. And it&#8217;s too overwhelming to measure everything. So if you are at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re starting out with measurement but don&#8217;t have a clearly  articulated strategy &#8211; or any strategy at all &#8211; you&#8217;re probably feeling  stuck about what to measure to manage performance. With no goals, no  objectives, and no clear priorities, everything seems important. And  it&#8217;s too overwhelming to measure everything.</p>
<p>So if you are at a  loss for what to start measuring, then try these 5 basic performance  measures. Spend as little time as possible tailoring them to your  business; spend more time pilot testing them. You&#8217;ll learn tonnes more  about the best measures for your business through getting started with  something, rather than waiting until you&#8217;ve designed the best way to  measure.</p>
<p><strong>measure #1 is customer satisfaction</strong></p>
<p>This  first is probably the most important of the 5 basic measures. It&#8217;s the  only measure that will connect you with the relevance of the work you&#8217;re  doing. If customers aren&#8217;t happy, then everyone is wasting at least a  portion of their time. Measure how your customer judges the outcome of  your product or service, through surveys or at the end of each  transaction with the customer. You can ask them directly, give them a  survey form, or send them to a website form.</p>
<p>If you also collect  data about what aspects of your product or service are most important to  customers, it will give you clues about more specific things that might  be important to measure also e.g. easy access to support staff or  accuracy of bills.</p>
<p><strong>measure #2 is product/service defects</strong></p>
<p>Defects  is a measure of quality, and a translation of what the customer expects  your product or service to do, into something you can count to assess  how often the product or service actually does what is expected.</p>
<p>Your  customer satisfaction measure is a companion to this one. And the extra  data collected about what is most important to customers about your  product or service will help you define what constitutes a defect (e.g.  something breaks, something doesn&#8217;t operate correctly, a delivery  deadline was missed, an invoice has errors).</p>
<p><strong>measure #3  is cycle time</strong></p>
<p>The time it takes to produce or deliver  your product or service for your customer is a surprisingly useful thing  to measure. It&#8217;s not just about meeting the time commitments you made  to your customer. It&#8217;s just as importantly about focusing everyone on  the things that make the cycle time what it is. And this is usually dead  time between hand-offs in the process, waste and rework due to errors  or lax standards, and even things that didn&#8217;t need to be done at all.</p>
<p>An  alternative or companion measure to cycle time might be on time  delivery, which links it more to the customer&#8217;s experience. Just  remember the value of measuring cycle time for internal benefit too.</p>
<p><strong>measure  #4 is productivity</strong></p>
<p>Productivity is a measure of your  process efficiency, and is essentially the rate at which you can produce  outputs, relative to the input it takes to do so. A great measure to  focus you on eliminating waste and rework in delivering your products  and services to your customers.</p>
<p>For example, one way to think  about productivity is to compare how much you&#8217;re producing relative the  time it takes, such as number of work hours. Another way to think about  productivity is about quantity versus cost &#8211; how much are you producing,  relative to what it costs in resources and labour.</p>
<p><strong>measure  #5 is innovation (or improvement) ideas</strong></p>
<p>Even if you&#8217;re  not ready to call it innovation (call it improvement instead), this  fifth basic measure is about stimulating one of the behaviours that  support a performance culture, namely making active suggestions about  how to improve performance.</p>
<p>Particularly when the first 4 basic  measures are shared and discussed among the team, actively measuring  something as simple as the number of improvement ideas suggested, or the  number of targeted improvements tested or implemented, encourages  everyone to deepen their understanding about performance, and how they  can influence it.</p>
<p><strong>The 5 basic measures are a springboard,  not a solution</strong></p>
<p>Remember, don&#8217;t try to get it perfect  before you begin measuring anything. It&#8217;s not until you start using  measures that you discover new questions and clearer information needs.  Use these five basic measures as a springboard to get used to measuring  and through their use, get closer to understanding what you really do  need to measure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.verbera.co.uk/resources/index.php/five-basic-performance-measures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Purchasing / Procurement KPI</title>
		<link>http://www.verbera.co.uk/resources/index.php/purchasing-procurement-kpi/</link>
		<comments>http://www.verbera.co.uk/resources/index.php/purchasing-procurement-kpi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Verbera</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[KPI Examples]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.verbera.co.uk/resources/?p=244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Purchasing / Procurement KPI 1. Delivery on time • Formula: the number of delivery on time / total delivery. • Apply this formula to each provider and entire company every month. 2. Delivery is not enough quantity, quality • Formula: with the total number of delivery with enough quality/ quantity / the number of total [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Purchasing / Procurement KPI</p>
<h4>1. Delivery on time</h4>
<p>•	Formula: the number of delivery on time / total delivery.<br />
•	Apply this formula to each provider and entire company every month.</p>
<h4>2. Delivery is not enough quantity, quality</h4>
<p>•	Formula: with the total number of delivery with enough quality/  quantity / the number of total delivery .</p>
<h4>3. Quantity bought over required</h4>
<p>•	This rate determine the number of products using in actual in  comparison with quantity planned.<br />
•	This rate determines the effectiveness of the purchasing order.<br />
•	The rate may be identified in quantity or money.</p>
<h4>5. Purchasing cost</h4>
<p>•	By value of purchasing / sales value<br />
•	Compare this with the percentage rate as planned.</p>
<h4>6. Cost of purchasing units</h4>
<p>•	This rate is total purchase cost / total sales.</p>
<h4>7. Transaction cost unit of purchasing</h4>
<p>•	Formula = (Total cost of purchasing – a total cost of goods) /  sales turnover.<br />
•	You can compare this rate with different goods in order to view  transaction costs a high or low</p>
<h4>8. Suppliers rating.</h4>
<p>•	Number of suppliers accounting for 80% of the value of goods<br />
•	The number of suppliers of goods per year<br />
•	Number of suppliers be removed per year..<br />
•	Number of new suppliers per year..</p>
<p><em>Sample KPIs courtesy of <a href="http://www.hrvinet.com/">hrvinet.com</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.verbera.co.uk/resources/index.php/purchasing-procurement-kpi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Maintenance KPI</title>
		<link>http://www.verbera.co.uk/resources/index.php/maintenance-kpi/</link>
		<comments>http://www.verbera.co.uk/resources/index.php/maintenance-kpi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Verbera</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Information]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.verbera.co.uk/resources/?p=239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1. Time taken to answer maintenance calls • Time from call for maintenance to time of repairing. • You should maintain work log to summarize this rate. 2. % of preventive maintenance cost • Formula: % preventive maintenance cost / total maintenance costs • Preventive maintenance are activities for the purpose of maintaining equipment and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4>1. Time taken to answer maintenance calls</h4>
<p>•	Time from call for maintenance to time of repairing.<br />
•	You should maintain work log to summarize this rate.</p>
<h4>2. % of preventive maintenance cost</h4>
<p>•	Formula: % preventive maintenance cost / total maintenance costs<br />
•	Preventive maintenance are activities for the purpose of maintaining  equipment and facilities in satisfactory operating condition by  providing for systematic inspection, detection, and correction of  incipient failures either before they occur or before they develop into  major defects.</p>
<h4>4. Mean Time to Repair (MTTR)</h4>
<p>•	Mean Time to Repair is average time between the occurrence of an  incident and its resolution.</p>
<h4>4. Preventive maintenance hours</h4>
<p>•	Formula: total hours of preventive maintenance per year.</p>
<h4>5. Schedule Completion Effectiveness (%)</h4>
<p>•	Formula: actual maintenance hours planned / maintenance hours  planned to complete scheduled tasks.</p>
<h4>6. Critical Equipment availability</h4>
<p>•	Number of critical equipment availability / total breakdowns</p>
<h4>7. Number of breakdowns</h4>
<p>•	Formula: Total breakdowns per year or per department.</p>
<h4>8. MTBF</h4>
<p>•	MTBF is Mean Time Between Failures.<br />
•	It is total time of failures and it is almost costs to my company</p>
<h4>9. % of maintenance rework</h4>
<p>Maintenance action that is a repeat of a previous, ineffective effort  relative to all maintenance work.</p>
<h4>10. Total maintenance cost per year.</h4>
<p>•	Total maintenance cost = total preventive and corrective  maintenance costs.</p>
<h4>11. Maintenance cost per unit</h4>
<p>•	Formula: Total maintenance cost / number of produced units.<br />
•	This rate is used to compare to last period or competitors in same  business field.</p>
<h4>12. % of maintenance hours of operating time</h4>
<p>•	Maintenance hours is the actual maintenance hours spent maintaining  an item of equipment (or plant).<br />
•	Maintenance hours includes preventive and corrective maintenance  hours.</p>
<h4>13. % of corrective maintenance cost</h4>
<p>•	Formula: % corrective maintenance cost / total maintenance costs.<br />
•	Corrective maintenances are activities to carry out on a defect which  has caused equipment to be taken out of service.</p>
<h4>14. Budget compliance</h4>
<p>•	Formula: Total budget implemented / budget planned</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.verbera.co.uk/resources/index.php/maintenance-kpi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quality KPI</title>
		<link>http://www.verbera.co.uk/resources/index.php/quality-kpi/</link>
		<comments>http://www.verbera.co.uk/resources/index.php/quality-kpi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Verbera</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Information]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.verbera.co.uk/resources/?p=237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quality KPI 1. The percentage must do it again – rework • The rework rate is number of defect products must be rework as requirements. • This rate reflects the loss of the company by the workers to do the products, processes. 2. The types of rework rate: a&#62; Rework rate of workers in a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quality KPI</p>
<h4>1.  The percentage must do it again – rework</h4>
<p>•	The rework rate is number of defect products must be rework as  requirements.<br />
•	This rate reflects the loss of the company by the workers to do the  products, processes.</p>
<h4>2.  The types of rework rate:</h4>
<p>a&gt; Rework rate of workers in a department.</p>
<p>•	This rate reflects skills of workers or the “care“ level of  workers.<br />
•	There are workers with their productivity is very high but their  rework rate also very high.</p>
<p>b&gt; The rework rate of a department:</p>
<p>Using this rate let you level of reword and the management ability of  managers / supervisors.</p>
<p>c&gt;  Compare rework to other departments.</p>
<p>You should not compare in terms of value that you just compare in  terms of quantity.</p>
<p>d&gt; Rework rate of entire company.</p>
<p>e&gt; The amount lost due to rework.</p>
<p>•	Time loss due to remake the products including time of product made  + preparation time + time to rework – standard time.<br />
•	Lost value = time lost due to rework * productivity * price.</p>
<h4>3. The rate of defect goods</h4>
<p>The rate of defect goods are all products damaged by the department  or individual that made.</p>
<p>a&gt; The rate of defect goods of individual<br />
•	The rate of damaged goods by individuals can be calculated by product  or step in manufacturing process.<br />
•	You should have a policy of reward / punishment to encourage reduce  this rate.<br />
•<br />
b&gt; The rate of defect goods of department</p>
<p>•	With the total number of damaged / total number of products /  order.<br />
•	You can create policies such as the penalty / award in 3.b.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.verbera.co.uk/resources/index.php/quality-kpi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Productivity KPI</title>
		<link>http://www.verbera.co.uk/resources/index.php/productivity-kpi/</link>
		<comments>http://www.verbera.co.uk/resources/index.php/productivity-kpi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Verbera</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Information]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.verbera.co.uk/resources/?p=235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[KPI-Productivity 1. Company productivity • Formula: Total sales turnover / total employee. • You should compare this rate of your company to competitors in same business field. 2. Order productivity by time: • Formula: Order productivity by week or day. 3. Productivity by individuals: • Personal Productivity is the amount produced by each individual work [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KPI-Productivity</p>
<h4>1.  Company productivity</h4>
<p>•	Formula:  Total sales turnover / total employee.<br />
•	You should compare this rate of your company to competitors in same  business field.</p>
<h4>2. Order productivity by time:</h4>
<p>•	Formula: Order productivity by week or day.</p>
<h4>3. Productivity by individuals:</h4>
<p>•	Personal Productivity is the amount produced by each individual  work in a unit time.<br />
•	Through this criteria, you will know what workers do effectively.<br />
•	Note: the number of products are product quality. Workers with high  rates also may be high defect products.</p>
<h4>4. Productivity by department:</h4>
<p>•	Productivity by departments are products made in a time unit.<br />
•	Productivity of a department is a target to evaluate effectiveness of  departments and department managers.</p>
<h4>5. Compare productivity:</h4>
<p>Compare productivity help you know you’re standing where to find a  suitable solution for your company.<br />
You should compare the efficiency of any angle?<br />
•	Among individuals with different<br />
•	Between the departments together<br />
•	Between companies with competitors in the industry and other companies  in the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.verbera.co.uk/resources/index.php/productivity-kpi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

